Government Expenditure and Revenue Collection

governance Expenditure and measureation enhancement accretionCHAPTER 1 substructure1.1 OverviewThe kinship amid political relation tax tax tax and expense is a in truth important topic and has been an essential issue for many a(prenominal) economists and policy makers as it represents work out shortfall, authorities disbursal Plans and taxation structure of a country. Since the main objective of e very(prenominal) political sympathies is to improve scotch yield with depleted debt aims, better education placement, development of infrastructure and job opportunities better m unmatchabletary policy is privationed to achieve these goals. From a short term position fiscal policy is said to be expansionary when political relation usances give-up the ghosts the total taxation and the momenting deficit is then financed by the administration, However if these usances tins in economic growth then there is a yen term relationship pull round betwixt gov ernment ingestion and economic growth. In addendum different studies indicate that the close of Economic growth is depended on tax levels. Whereas many believe that the most signifi sightt factor that contributes in economic growth is tax level as the collection for development purposes of most true and developing countries depend on tax revenue.1.2 seek ProblemIn Pakistan the level of budget deficits realize consistently increasing from 2005 which is then financed by the government through external and domestic borrowing resulting in a higher debt levels due to high interest greet associated with it and leads to much in store(predicate) tax expectations. Thus the financing by the government for the compensation of deficit is an important variable, several studies have put light on the effect of fiscal deficit but very few have move to find the reasons and gets of these deficits which is why the nexus amongst government revenue and uptake is still an unsolved issue. T herefore the main purpose of this research is to arna the causal relationship between government revenue and expenditure.1.3 HypothesesH1 Tax Revenue causes Government Expenditure.H2 Government Expenditure causes Tax Revenue.H3 Tax Revenue and Government Expenditure bifacially cause to each different.1.4 Outline of the StudyThe research studies the causal relationship between government expenditure and tax revenue to trip up the reasons for the consistent budget deficits in Pakistan from many years. In addition cartridge holder series analyses have been done to forecast the trend of government expenditure and revenue based on the leading variable.CHAPTER 2LITERATURE polish upNanthakumar and Taha (2007) have tack together a s get across relationship between disbursal and revenue. Further much there is a long-run impact exist expenditures that degrade as input into the production function and those that enter as inputs in investing technologies.Koch, Schoeman, and Tonder (2005) found that there is an association between onus of taxes and economic growth agree to the findings based on the information of 1960-2002 if tax burden decreases economic growth subjoins significantly.Friedman (1982) explains expenditure of the government depends on total revenue because as taxes attachs expenditure increases by which deficit remains at the resembling level, thusly the level of fiscal deficit cannot be stamp downd by increasing taxes.Buchanan and Wagner (1977) on the other hand have presented an alternative guessing that increase in taxes does not lead towards low expenditures because taxes creates higher legal injury of goods for the public due to high interest cost associated with it Buchanan and Wagner suggest that in order to restore deficit government should limit its financing ability.Sobhee (2004) time-tested the creator from tax to expenditure and from expenditure to taxes by exploitation the data of public finance and founded that for the utilization of public expenditure in a small economy government root accommodate the needful funds, therefore to avoid the situation of fiscal deficit the government must cautiously monitor and control its spending programs.Fasano and Wang (2002) in a research on GCC countries founded that the primary Source of revenue is oil and due to the economic fluctuations medium-term expenditure strategy should be adopted according to which expenditure should not exceed the non-oil revenue so that in recessions to compensate expenditures oil revenues can be injected by short-term accommodations.Second possibleness where causality runs from expenditure to revenue the government first spend and then to accommodate the required level of expenditure adjusts tax policy.Peacock and Wiseman (1979) argue that due to economic crises government expenditure increases and remain at the homogeneous level even when the crises is over. In other words government expenditure is driven by untouchable ec onomic crises which is able to change public perception about the size of the government.Gounder, Narayan, and Prasad (2007) find compatibility with the second hypothesis that the increase in taxes for the accommodation of government spending repairs on the capital investment by investors due to the upkeep of expecting higher taxes in future.The third hypothesis is fiscal synchrony according to which expenditure and revenue decisions are mugwump and bilaterally cause to each other. Reflecting the traditional theories for the demand for public goods.Meltzer and Richard (1981), the demand of public expenditures and taxes need to compensate these expenditures are compared with many alternative spending programs for cost good abridgment, therefore the practical implication of this hypothesis is bidirectional causality.Narayan and Narayan (2006) suggest trine reasons regarding the importance of nexus between government revenue and expenditure first if proper implementation on pol icies is interpreted into consideration regarding government revenue fiscal deficit can be avoided, second if causality runs from expenditure to revenue outflow increases due to the fear that government spends first and pay for it later by increasing taxes. Third in matter of bidirectional causality expenditure can rise faster than revenue which can create huge budget deficits because revenue and expenditure decisions are independent of each other.Baharumshah and Lau (2007) Find two sets of different results where the fiscal policy of Korea, capital of Singapore and Thailand is driven by expenditures where the government finances revenue for the planned expenditures according to the limit of the balanced budget which facilitate the long term sustainable budget position. However the taxation system should be implemented by taking care of the overall smooth fiscal policy. Whereas in sequel of Malaysia and Philippines expenditures and revenues are independent of each other and the le vel of government expenditures and revenues is rigid through fiscal policy based on marginal cost and revenue. what is more the findings indicate that in order to achieve long economic growth fiscal consolidation is necessary to reduce deficits and debt levels which lead a country to fulfill expenditure priorities better and provide funds to more productive sectors.Griffin and McKinley (1992) believes that the expenditure policies of the government should be directed towards long-term future growth and for the well being of the people, Therefore activities that contribute more on socio economic development should be increased instead of victimisation resources and funds to military defense projects.King and Rebelo (1990) taxation has a very important role in the long run growth operation of a country where growth is not affected by corroborative taxation, however direct taxation is harmful for growth.Nanthakumar and Taha (2008) found in an abridgment of Malaysia that the maj or part of taxes is direct taxes and reducing direct and indirect taxes leads to reduce in government expenditures, In addition non-tax revenue does not contribute much in economys growth.Hondroyiannis and Papapetrou (1996) find one-way causality running from government expenditure to revenues in Greece where the reason of fiscal deficit from a long period of time was government spending decisions. The government spending to gross domestic product is very high in Greece which results an operating inefficiency for the economy. Furthermore the results indicated that reducing fiscal deficit without reducing the government expenditure leads to failure.Ahiakpor and Amirkhalkhali (1989) Based on the analysis of Canada found that to show the relevant results of fiscal policy government increase taxes which is a temporary and incomplete act in order to in full take control over fiscal deficit the government must reduce or limit its expenditures instead of finding ways to increase tax reve nue burden on public.Baghestani and McNown (2004) in a instruct of Egypt and Jordan claim that to promote domestic savings and private investment it is necessary to eliminate budget deficit for both the counties. Baghestani supported the causality from tax revenue to expenditure in upshot of Egypt and bi-lateral causality in trip Jordan. Furthermore promoted the process of privatization because it facilitate high domestic saving and investment and at the same time help oneselfs to reduce fiscal deficit.Neyapti (2008) studied the bring of fiscal decentalisation on government revenue and expenditure and indicated that decentralization improves quality of governance which leads to decrease in budget deficit and stable economic condition. However the efficiency of fiscal decentralization increases in case of large population.Keho (2010) Study the data fo 1660 to 2005 to analyses the causal relationship between government expenditure and tax revenue to see which expenditure and rev enue items plays a part in the reduction of budget deficit and found that GDP has significant effect on government expenditure. Furthermore the findings of sodbuster causality test indicate unidirectional causality from government revenue to expenditure according to the findings the implementation for the elimination of fiscal deficit should not be made by just increasing revenues. Thus for the honorable results spending cuts are necessary. In other words tax system should be made with proper spending control system.Brennan and Buchanan (1980) suggest that in order to reduce fiscal deficit constitutional limits should be compel on post-constitutional government to reduce the revenue collection by last mentioned governments so that position of maximum financing of goods demanded by public and stripped-down revenue collection can be achieved.Baffes and Anwar (1990) conducted the research for the countries Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and Pakistan to determine the manner of g overnment towards revenue and expenditures for the alignment of fiscal deficit. The results found to be arrogant for Mexico, Brazil and Pakistan while the similar findings havent been found for Argentina and Chile. For Brazil, Mexico and Pakistan causality runs in both ways in other words bidirectional causality where decisions for the government spending and revenue are taken simultaneously. However in case of Argentina and Chile causality runs from expenditure to revenue. The results indicates that to control budget deficit the government should increase revenue collection and restrain expenditure whereas public expenditures should be reduced in Argentina and Chile.Stoian (2008) founded in case of Romania by applying Johansen cointegration and Error Correction pretending that the long run relationship between government revenue and expenditure do not affect major fiscal imbalances.CHAPTER 3RESEARCH METHODS3.1 Method of Data CollectionData of the two variables Government Expendit ure and Total Revenue is taken from secondary sources with the help of duple sources which includes (Ministry of Finance), (State bank of Pakistan) and (Hand book of Statistics on Pakistan Economy).3.2 seek SizeSample of 31 observations have been used by victimisation the data of public finance from the year 1979-2010. Where the variable (Total Tax Revenue) has been created by adding indirect-tax, direct-tax, Non-tax revenue and surcharges and (Total Expenditure) has been calculated by adding Development and Non-Development Expenditures.3.3 Research Modelsodbuster model is used to study the causality where TR is the total revenue and TE is total government expenditure.TRt = ?1 + 1 + TEt-1 + TEt-2 + ET1TEt = ?2 + 2 + TRt-1 + TEt-2 + ET2The in a higher place two equation represents the hypothesis where the causality running from total expenditure to revenue in equation one and from revenue to expenditure in equation two. The rejection of any hypothesis concludes unidirectional cau sality between government expenditure to revenue. However, rejection of both the hypothesis concludes bidirectional causality in other words fiscal synchronization exists between government revenue and expenditure.3.4 statistical TechniqueIn this research granger causality test by Granger (1969) has been applied to study the causal relationship by analyse one time series with another (Government Expenditure with Government revenue) where one variable becomes the cause of the other variable to predict it significantly. In addition cross-correlation coefficient has been applied to assess the correlation between both time series variables.CHAPTER 4RESULTS4.1 Findings and Interpretation of the resultsTable 4.1The summary given in the table above shows that there is a unidirectional causality exist between total government expenditure and total revenue, as the value of F-Statistic is 3.5, Furthermore both lag 1 and lag 2 are tested to achieve better results as table 4.2 indicates there fore the null hypothesis (TOTAL_RE does not Granger Cause TOTAL_EX) is rejected.Table 4.3Figure 4.1Total_Revenue with Total_ExpenditureLag add togetherThe results of cross-correlation indicates total revenue as a leading time series variabler with a strong correlation of .994 with government expenditures at lag 0, furthermore correlation a positive correlation has been found from lag 1 to lag 11, However the correlation is decreasing and from 12 to 16 lags correlation in negative predicting that with the increase in total revenue, total government expenditure will decrease in future.4.2 Hypotheses Assessment SummaryCHAPTER 5CONCLUSION, DISCUSSION, IMPLICATIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH5.1 ConclusionThe research studies the causal link between total government expenditure and total revenue in Pakistan using granger causality test and the supportive cross correlation from 1979-2010. The result from granger causality supports the hypothesis that tax revenue causes government expenditure in Pakistan. In addition cross correlation results have indicated long-term results that with the increase in revenue expenditures will increase. Therefore the major culture drawn from this research is that in order to eliminate the problem of fiscal deficit and sustainable economic growth government should focus on the policies which facilitate increasing revenue.5.2 DiscussionVarious studies have analyzed the causal relationship between government expenditure and revenue. Some supported with unidirectional causality occurring from revenue to spending and from expenditure to revenue whereas some have indicated the result of bidirectional causality. However, both the variables have significant impact on budget deficit and economic growth.Fiscal deficit in Pakistan is a major issue as the findings of cross correlation indicates that the revenue and expenditures are correlated which means that as revenue increase expenditure increases and deficit remains at the same level and to compens ate this deficit government increases its debt financing from domestic and foreign sources which leads towards inflation and high interest rates.5.3 Implications and RecommendationsThe model and analysis of this study is very useful for economists and policy makers as it helps in enhancing revenue by tax reform programs. In addition for the determination of optimal spending expenditure reform assessment can be done through cost and benefit analysis which will help in setting objectives for tax collections and better utilization of taxes.5.4 Future ResearchFuture research possibilities could be as follows first variables like matter income and debt financing could be included in the research. Second data sets of multiple countries would be interesting to analyze the causal relationship using the same model in comparison with this research.